What is true freedom? Is it the ability to make choices? Do we really have true freedom? Freedom is the feeling you experience when you are not obligated to obey anyone and can act as you please. But are we truly free? Even if we are, are we free enough to do whatever we wish? My answer to that is no. Logically speaking, one might think we are free, since we do not have to obey anyone—except for laws, which everyone must follow. We are said to have "free will," as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution. Yet even with this so-called freedom, there are limitations, and these limits make me question what true freedom really is.
For example, in "The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian," we see that even though Victor had legal freedom, there were still constraints to how much of it they could have; there was discrimination, isolation, and stereotypes. "As they hurry out of the carnival, a small redheaded boy points his finger at Victor and mimes shooting a gun, shouting 'You're dead, Indian'" (Alexie 123). Is it even true freedom if you can fully experience it? By the 1990s, Native Americans were U.S. citizens with full legal rights, including the right to vote, travel, and access to the courts. How can Victor achieve true freedom? Is it by fighting? Fleeing? or Forbearing? If Victor fought for his freedom and didn't let his race disrespect him, then it could have reinforced negative perceptions of Native Americans as "aggressive" in the eyes of others. If Victor fled, then he would have lost his dignity, as not fighting for his own freedom would undermine his and his race's dignity. If Victor endured, it would be a significant blow to his self-esteem, and as someone who understood the value of freedom and sought to achieve it, he would've felt powerless and enslaved. But Victor chose the most complex solution: enduring and fleeing instead of fighting him. This makes me wonder if true freedom can ever be achieved.
Just as Victor's legal freedom is constrained by social prejudice, immigrants like Dennis Behn face limits to their freedom imposed by cultural expectations and social judgments.
As Victor and Dennis Benn confront societal and cultural constraints that restrict their Freedom, Thoreau argues that true freedom requires active resistance against injustice. Whereas Victor navigates discrimination on the reservation, and Dennis Benn struggles to live up to the dogma set by immigrant communities, Thoreau emphasizes the moral obligation to oppose unjust laws and systems, showing that freedom is not simply given; it must be claimed through deliberate action.
In Civil Disobedience Thoreau, emphasizes on the imporance of resistence against oppression to achieve freedom, he says, "if ten honest men only,---ay, if one honest man, in this State of Massachusetts, ceasing to hold slaves, were to actually withdraw from the copartnership, and be locked up in the country jail therefore, it would be the abolition of slavery in America" (Civil Disobedience 386). It is valid to assert that Thoreau is a hardcore believer in 'Fighting for freedom', as long as it doesn't involve violence. His tone, diction, and use of hyperbole (such as "if one honest man"....) compel the readers to think deeply and consider the urgency in his ambition of being free.
Another example that I personally thought would be insightful and help us comprehend how there is no definition of True Freedom is "Attack on Titan", where Eren Yeager's pursuit of freedom shows how complicated true freedom can be. Eren wants to be free from the walls and the oppression of Marley, and he makes extreme choices to achieve it. He fights, rebels, and ultimately sacrifices his own morality and the lives of others for his desire to be Free. While these choices temporarily give him a sense of Freedom, they also create catastrophic consequences for the future of Eldia: a lot of his friends die, societies and communities are destroyed, and the cycle of hatred continues. Eren's struggle showcases that freedom cannot be achieved through violent rebellion; instead, it leads to a never-ending cycle of hatred among societies. Even when one achieves the ability to act freely, it may come at a cost, showing that true freedom is never simple or without responsibility.
Ultimately, these readings show that true freedom is not something we inherently possess. As long as we live under societal dogma, blindly follow set rules, or resist in ways that are morally or socially inappropriate, our freedom is limited. Victor experiences the constraints of prejudice and stereotypes, Dennis Behn faces cultural expectations and judgment from those around her, and Thoreau emphasizes that freedom requires careful, moral action. Eren's pursuit of freedom illustrates the consequences of violent resistance. True freedom is the ability to make your own choices without accepting the harsh reality that freedom is limited; we can never truly be Free.
I agree that freedom would be the ability to act without regard for the consequences. But one could argue that we are free, we are free to break laws, criminals exist. I am free to fight someone, yet they too are free to oppose me. I am free, free to choose how I live, and what I do with my life. I am free to fall in line if I so choose, just as I am free to oppose and "be a counterfriction to the machine". The freedom did not come to me when I chose to oppose, the decision was mine from the start, of whether I choose to fight or not. The only thing that held back my freedom, was my mind which may be conflicted on what I choose. Yet, they were still my decisions. So long as you understand that you are free to choose, you are free. I am free to do and choose as I please, and the world is free to oppose me. Oftentimes the decisions we choose are just so logical we forget that they were even a choice, but remember, it was our freedom and will that brought us here.
ReplyDeleteI liked your interpretation on how freedom is limited due to societal pressures and expectations. Often times, especially for immigrants like we saw with Nicole Dennis-Behn and Sherman Alexie, the ways society is unjust towards them makes it harder for them to choose to do what they want to do and be what they want to be. It is harder for them to perform acts of "civil disobedience" like Thoreau calls for. However, I do believe that from a personal level, they do not have any less freedom than others. While society may pressure you and judge you, and rude people in public may always be there to point fingers (like the example you gave for Sherman Alexie), in the end it is you solely who decides how you respond and how you feel. You alone have the power to control your emotions and adapt so that you can best enjoy life as you can.
ReplyDeleteI actually enjoyed how you were able to combine so many disparate voices Victor, Dennis Benn, Thoreau, and even Eren of Attack on Titan- so that you could demonstrate that being free is never as simple as being free. I found it most interesting when you highlighted the prices of each option: fleeing, enduring, resisting or even rebelling violently. It helped me consider that all avenues to freedom will be trade offs and that perhaps the actual freedom is not all about perfection, but how individuals choose to confront those restrictions. It was done very well in your conclusion.
ReplyDeleteI love your exploration of the complexity of freedom - it’s a very nuanced take on the exit ticket prompt last week about whether true freedom was resistance or endurance. All the examples you used truly showed all the dimensions of freedom and how it’s not as simple as Thoreau makes it out to be with bluntly defying whatever takes away your freedom, which, as you examined, is often not a viable choice for minorities and those oppressed. It acknowledges how although technically we have the “freedom” to do whatever we want, absolute freedom is usually not the highest priority, and there is a limit where the sacrifice required to achieve true freedom exceeds the benefits of achieving it. I also thought all the rhetorical questions made the tone and message of your piece very strong. Overall, great read!
ReplyDelete